http://www.gabriellerosario.com/wp-content/themes/hashone
http://www.gabriellerosario.com
Subscribe to my RSS feed

4 Comments Social media etiquette from an agency perspective.

Article written by the brilliant Gabrielle on the 15 Feb 2010

Self-regulate. Self-moderate. Are terms that are cropping up more and more in my vocabulary. It’s advice to clients. It’s advice to peers (who ask for it) It’s mostly advice to myself.

My personal approach on Social media is that I don’t comment on client related content or promotion unless I disclose that its client work. The reason, because I don’t and won’t suggest or promote something to my followers or friends unless I legitimately want to support it. And if its client work then I feel that they/you should know that.

Last year I got into trouble for doing just that. And its because it appeared that we were the only agency producing the work. So I removed the tweet and all was well. But it meant that I couldn’t even do that.

Then today standing in the queue at the bank, I noticed, again, the remarkable misrepresentation of “the world” about to descend on South Africa for the world cup in their murals. Even the teller confirmed that he thought it was all very white. Very odd. I took a photo. I was a moment away from criticising the creative, and then a little voice cautioned me against it. Why? Because its your client. And I don’t want it to seem that I’m criticising your client’s work, when I work on a banking client too. Which means I can’t talk about my banking client either. And the other major bank out there, I don’t think knows how to spell Twitter, so there is no point complaining about them anyway.

On that. Nobody likes a complainer. I learnt a long time ago, that as much as I sometimes want to be honest, that its best to keep upbeat in this medium. I unfollow people who complain too much. No matter how ‘influential’ people are meant to be. I hide people’s comments in facebook when they are too depressing or emo. My most used word in my tweets last year was ‘love’, and I like that. I’m sure that I get unfollowed, often, for my ‘purges’ which usually occur whilst I am waiting. Waiting for the menu. Waiting for my order. Waiting in the queue. Waiting for a video to load. Waiting for the kettle to boil. “Tweet while you wait.” (Hmm would make for a nice service campaign for a retailer, ‘tweet if you have waited in this queue for longer than 5 mins’) But I try not to complain. Which means that I’m not objective or honest in my complaints about issues that aggravate me as a consumer. And that’s largely because they are probably your client. Or mine.

Latest Twitter Stats in SA, argued and agreed upon by the top dogs sits at 88 000 users. I’d like to know what the average number of followers is for each of the 88 000. I hazard a guess that the majority of Twitterati with the largest number of followers and arguable influence are in actual fact in ‘The Industry’, particularly in SA. Which means that they can’t be objective I even wonder about Radio DJ’s with a large reach. What of their sponsors – how objective are they, really? How dare they, we, criticise or comment on a brand? Heaven help if you are up for pitch and client sees your thoughts. Eeek. Or maybe you’re just gutsy enough not to care?!

Where is the line between being a regular opinionated consumer and protecting your business interests? Mine, after testing all routes and as I become more engrained in brand work, is to self-regulate, self-moderate when I want to complain. And provide positive commentary where and when deserved.

4 Comments Subscribe to these comments.

February 16, 2010 9:00 am Neil @@neil_pursey Website Reply

Interesting post, so are you saying that if I’m tweeting for a client you wouldn’t post an interesting article that another blog wrote, example: I have a client that sells trees but a lawn company writes an interesting article which complements trees. What do I do?

2010-02-16 09:23:47 admin

Hi Neil. I think that when brands are talking to brands (clients are talking to clients) then its ok. Its when agencies are involved that the boundaries become blurred. (For me) I like the space of www.10and5.com because it is an appropriate forum for me to add honest comment. In the open field of social media, dialogue can, and is often taken out of context or misinterpreted. So I guess, it really depends on who is listening to you?

With the #insouthafrica meme it was very interesting to note the subtle change that occurred when it was announced that it had started trending. Suddenly as people became aware that others (particularly the U.S) were perhaps interested and listening, the tweets became educational. E.g. we don't have Lions in our backyards or the explanation of "now, now". Was intriguing, to me, and it begs the question, how would your commentary change if you actually knew who was listening?

We don't know what ORM tools are picking up our streams - should they be permission based. So yes, Brand X, Y or Z, I allow you to listen to me (or my ramblings, rather ;))

March 16, 2010 7:14 pm Felix @felixdesroches Website Reply

Great piece Gaby, I especially appreciated the almost-debacle while in the queue at the bank – I don’t know about you, but I regularly put my foot in my mouth, both online and off, so it’s refreshing to see I’m not the only one who does it ;)

Having said all that, I’m torn when it comes to self-regulation. Sure, it’s never right to totally slander a client – but I do think well-crafted criticism, especially if deserved, can still be the right thing to do. The whole point of Twitter and social media is openness and transparency, which applies to both compliments and critiques. And besides, if you stay quiet the message could very well get out anyway – and without your initial input/control.

I do think there’s an easy solution to all this: either do as you say and divulge client associations, or to be even safer, simply create multiple social media (i.e. Twitter) profiles. As an individual I can be much freer with my opinions, while if I’m representing or working with a client, I’m obviously a little more constrained. An elegant, if potentially time consuming, answer, dontcha think?

Thoughts?

March 21, 2010 8:20 pm Mike McGrath @mikefj40 Website Reply

I agree that we have to be transparent and identifying a client when you tweet about them is just good sense. The problem I have is when a client urges you to enthusiastically tweet, endorse or otherwise promote a product that you are not personally captivated by. God forbid if someone DMs me and asks how cool it really is. At some point I feel the need to be honest, but maybe silence is the better option.

Leave a Comment!

Name
Email
URL
Twitter
Message
 
You must be logged in to post a
video comment.